suppose
suppose
Life is an old man carrying flowers on his head.
young death sits in a cafe
smiling, a piece of money held between
his thumb and first finger
(i say "will he buy flowers" to you
and "Death is young
life wears velour trousers
life totters, life has a beard" i
say to you who are silent. - "Do you see
Life? he is there and here,
or that, or this
or nothing or an old man 3 thirds
asleep, on his head
flowers, always crying
to nobody something about les
roses les bluets
yes,
will He buy?
Les belles bottes - oh hear
, pas cheres")
and my love slowly answered I think so. But
I think I see someone else
there is a lady, whose name is Afterwards
she is sitting beside young death, is slender;
likes flowers.
Commentary
Some people are just too smart for their own good. And E E Cummings is, IMHO, one of them. Not that I don’t get a kick out of his ingenious punctuation, his intriguing line breaks, his frequently bizarre spacing, his clever little witticisms (“3 thirds / asleep”). Reading Cummings is like listening to some great jazz pianist at work - the endlessness of his improvisations takes your breath away, the little tone jokes make you laugh out in surprise.
Except that you get so caught up in these clever little tricks that you never notice that underneath all that jazz is a sweet old melody. Underneath Cummings’ witty style is an incredible, singing, old-fashioned poet, a master of image and emotion. Cummings writes elsewhere “since feeling is first / he who pays attention / to the syntax of things / will never wholly kiss you”. And he who pays attention to the syntax of cummings’ poems will never wholly appreciate them.
This poem is an excellent illustration: the punctuation and word play are tame, by Cummings standards, but the image of life as a poor old man selling flowers to a young, rich death is one of the cruellest and most heartbreaking that I’ve ever come across, and Cummings draws you deeper and deeper into the pathos, until that final two word line leaves you with a sense of infinite hope. Pay attention to the syntax here, and you’ll see why this is a really clever poem. Ignore the syntax and you’ll see why it’s a beautiful one.
— Aseem
Show 1 commentHide comments
From the Wondering Minstrels mailing list, 1999–2008.
J B · 26 February 2005
I respectfully submit that any good poem, and this certainly qualifies as that,
can not have it’s beauty floating somewhere “above” it’s syntax. And whatever cleverness it possesses that same cleverness possesses the poem’s beauty. Nothing in a good poem can be separated or dissected out without unraveling the whole reading experience and thereby missing the point of reading it in the first place. A good poem puts it’s beauty in the reader.
In such a remote place it is safe from molestation. It lingers for a time, a short spell and then disappears.
J Blue