The Lawyers Know Too Much

Carl Sandburg

 The lawyers, Bob, know too much.
 They are chums of the books of old John Marshall.
 They know it all, what a dead hand wrote,
 A stiff dead hand and its knuckles crumbling,
 The bones of the fingers a thin white ash.
         The lawyers know
         a dead man's thought too well.

 In the heels of the higgling lawyers, Bob,
 Too many slippery ifs and buts and howevers,
 Too much hereinbefore provided whereas,
 Too many doors to go in and out of.

 When the lawyers are through
 What is there left, Bob?
 Can a mouse nibble at it
 And find enough to fasten a tooth in?

 Why is there always a secret singing
 When a lawyer cashes in?
 Why does a hearse horse snicker
 Hauling a lawyer away?

 The work of a bricklayer goes to the blue.
 The knack of a mason outlasts a moon.
 The hands of a plasterer hold a room together.
 The land of a farmer wishes him back again.
          Singers of songs and dreamers of plays
          Build a house no wind blows over.
 The lawyers--tell me why a hearse horse snickers
          hauling a lawyer's bones.

Commentary

After reading the last submission to Minstrels about lawyers, I could not resist making a case in defence ;)

I’m always wary of the reaction I will get from people when I tell them that I am a lawyer. I’ve gotten used to the contempt and the look of disdain that come my way. I think I’ve also heard almost every lawyer joke that’s out there (and there’s far too many) [I’m reminded of the lawyer who said “well, then, the next time you’re arrested, go hire a comedian!” - martin]. I’ve browsed through many sites looking for poetry that (even if it does not glorify

lawyers) is (at least) not condescending towards them. I haven’t had much success.

This poem, much like a lawyer joke, highlights some of the stereotypes which give lawyers the reputation they have. The use of archaic legalese jargon, for instance. Attributes that lawyers are Insensitive, Cold, Callous and Unfeeling. Perhaps, that’s often the only way we can maintain objectivity and be competent? Lawyers do know how to show compassion and love. We also know how to laugh and feel. And shocking as it might sound, lawyers also appreciate poetry. But, that is when they’re not being lawyers. However, a competent lawyer is one that can put aside personal prejudices and feelings (even when they are in conflict with the client)and maintain objectivity.

No one explains this dichotomy to lawyer’s personality better than Mulan Ashwin, a fellow lawyer and lover of poetry (I found this poem by him on the web):

I am not a poet.
I am a lawyer.
Subtlety and sensitivity
are prerequisites for poets,
not so for lawyers.

I would be too scared to be
a poet; they feel too much.
Lawyers should not feel too much;
they are trained not to.

Can one train to be a poet?
To feel too much?

- Mulan Ashwin

Biography

Not much needs to be said about Carl Sandburg. The EB biography of Sandburg can be had at Poem #163

Cheers,

— Salima


The Wondering Minstrels, poem #1393 · 21 November 2003

Guest poem submitted by Salima Virani

Fair use

Show 2 commentsHide comments

From the Wondering Minstrels mailing list, 1999–2008.

Mallika Chellappa · 21 November 2003

I can’t agree that this poem, in any way, is a defence of lawyers! And, truth to tell, lawyers are one of my least favourite people, after insurance agents and doctors. This although my own daughter is a lawyer.

There is the principle of Natural Justice, and there is Law. Law is man-made, and changes. Smugglers after all are only supplying a need i.e. responding to market forces, but over the centuries have been pilloried for their innocent participation in the play of free market forces. Pirates have been hanged or knighted. Bootleggers - the less said the better.

Mallika

SCLLOM · 28 December 2006

RATIONALIZE ALL YOU WANT, LAWYERS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN TORT REFORM, GETTING RID OF PROBATE COURTS, AND MAKE IT SO REASONABLY INTELLIGENT PEOPLE CAN DO BUSINESS WITHOUT THESE “HIRED GUNS”. I COME FROM A GENERATION OF MEN WHO DID BUSINESS WITH A HAND SHAKE, UNTIL THE LAWYERS GOT INTO THE ACT, TRYING TO MAKE “SENSE” OUT OF NONSENSE”! IT IS ALL TO DO WITH MONEY AND NOTHING MORE. CARL SANDBURG SAID IT ALL AND THAT IS WHY “LAWYERS” ARE SO OFFENDED, BECAUSE THE TRUTH HURTS! IF WHAT I AM SAYING IS NOT TRUE WHY IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SO “OVER RUN” WITH LAWYERS? BECAUSE OF JUSTICE? CARING FOR PEOPLE? DON’T MAKE ME SNICKER. LAWYERS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN JUSTICE, THEY ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN MAKING A NAME FOR THEMSELVES, AND LINING THEIR POCKETS! THE TOBACCO LITIGATION, THE ASBESTOS LITIGATION, AND A MYRIAD OTHER LAWSUITS HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH JUSTICE, OTHER THAN THE “LAWYERS REFERRING TO “JUST US” TO FLEECE WHOMEVER, AND WHATEVER WE CAN, WITH IMPUNITY. YES! “WHY DOES A HEARSE HORSE SNICKER HAULING THE BONES OF A LAWYER?” LIKE I REALLY HAVE EMPATHY FOR LEGAL THIEVES? GET REAL!